Thursday, May 21, 2009
A fellow painter once remarked, upon viewing some of my landscapes, that it was clear I lived in a country setting. Like so much in painting, this could be interpreted in numerous ways. It does however put forth the question of subject matter, and what best suits each painter. Initially, my landscapes were an attempt to break away from the structured forms of past still life paintings. Scenes such as the one above, oil on canvas, 20 by 28 inches, practically demand a more open application of paint and colour. The subject matter changed the approach and even style of painting. Also, I have actually worked, cutting wood, in the forest depicted. How much does a personal connection find its way into the final image? If I packed up and painted landscapes in a different part of the world, would something be missing?
The counter-argument to all of this would be the works of Vincent Van Gogh. His favorite subjects were portraits, landscapes, and still lifes; the three most common in painting. Regardless of which one, Van Gogh's talent, skill, and of course expressive abilities, shown through. In other words, it didn't matter what he painted, his personality dominated.
Posted by Sören Dawson